Evidence Hub

Arginine vasopressin levels in nursing home residents with nighttime urinary incontinence

Ouslander JG, Nasr SZ, Miller M, Withington W, Lee CS, Wiltshire-Clement M, Cruise P, Schnelle JF

Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 1998

89 participants

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To examine the relationship between diurnal urine volume and plasma arginine vasopressin levels (AVP) in nursing home residents with nighttime urinary incontinence and a comparison group of frail but nondemented, continent geriatric board and care residents.

DESIGN: Case series.

SETTING: Four nursing homes and two board and care facilities.

PARTICIPANTS: Sixty-two nursing home residents and 27 board and care residents.

MEASUREMENTS: Daytime (7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m.) and nighttime (7:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m.) urine volumes of incontinent nursing home residents were measured over 3 days and 3 nights by reweighing preweighed adults diapers and toileting inserts emptied by research staff for the comparison group. AVP levels were drawn in the early morning (5:00 a.m. to 7:00 a.m.) before subjects arose and in the evening after an hour of lying in bed (8:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m.), and plasma levels were determined by radioimmunoassay.

RESULTS: Half of the nursing home residents and 82% of the comparison group had night/total urine volume ratios > or = 50%. Forty-nine percent of the total of 89 subjects had undetectable morning AVP levels, 61% had undetectable evening AVP levels, and 42% had undetectable AVP levels in both morning and evening. There were no significant differences in AVP levels between those with night/total urine volume ratios > or = 50% and < 50% in either the nursing home or comparison groups though the small number of comparison group subjects with ratios <…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case series, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health. Reported size: 89 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free