Evidence Hub

Global Prevalence and Distribution of Human Sarcocystosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Jongthawin J, Mahittikorn A, Wangdi K, Masangkay FR, Kotepui M

Tropical medicine and infectious disease, 2026

66,329 participants

Abstract

Human sarcocystosis is a neglected zoonotic infection caused by protozoa of the genus Sarcocystis. Although sporadic cases and outbreaks have been reported worldwide, the global burden of human infections has not been comprehensively synthesized. This study aimed to estimate the pooled prevalence and global distribution of Sarcocystis infections in humans. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines and registered with PROSPERO (CRD420251159944). PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Ovid, Nursing & Allied Health Premium, and Google Scholar were used for retrieving relevant studies. Observational studies published from 2000 onward reporting human Sarcocystis infections confirmed by microscopic and/or molecular methods were included. A random-effects model was used to estimate pooled prevalence. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic. Subgroup analyses and meta-regression were performed to explore sources of heterogeneity. Seventeen studies comprising 66,329 participants met the inclusion criteria. The pooled prevalence of human Sarcocystis infection was 0.85% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.33-2.19), with substantial heterogeneity (I2 = 98.2%). Prevalence estimates showed marked variation across continents, countries, participant groups, diagnostic methods, Sarcocystis species, and clinical forms of sarcocystosis. Although human Sarcocystis infection appears relatively rare, its prevalence is geographically heterogeneous…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 66,329 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free