Evidence Hub

Interventions addressing mental health in conflict-affected settings: A literature review

Falkbøll N, Østergaard MLD, Zapata García JG, Aponte Canencio DM, Modvig J, Brasholt M

Conflict and health, 2026

Abstract

The burden of mental health disorders is high in conflict-affected populations. However, there is still limited evidence from studies that measure the effectiveness of mental health interventions implemented in conflict and post-conflict settings. This study presents the results of a literature review aiming to identify those mental health interventions that have been implemented in such contexts. A systematic literature search was conducted in MEDLINE (PubMed), Scopus and PsycINFO leading to the identification of 33 relevant studies reporting on results of mental health-focused interventions with pre- and post- measurements. Eighteen studies were randomized clinical trials (RCTs), five were quasi-experimental and 10 were studies without controls. They covered 21 countries. Five RCTs reported effect sizes that were categorized as large. Their intervention models were Resource-Oriented Trauma Therapy (ROTATE), Problem Management Plus (PM+), a version of Narrative Exposure Therapy adapted for forensic offenders (FORNET), a contextual adaptation of the Unified Protocol (CXA-UP) and Common Elements Treatment Approach (CETA) respectively. Five other RCTs showed moderate effect sizes. All quasi-experimental studies and studies without controls reported some level of improvement in clients' well-being. Target groups and intervention types as well as providers of the interventions differed significantly across studies, as did outcome measures. PM + and NET including FORNET are the…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free