Evidence Hub

Treatment Options and Antifungal Resistance in Pediatric Candidozyma auris (Previously Candida auris) Infections: A Systematic Review of Clinical Outcomes

Stergiou K, Skourtsidis K, Kiosis G, Ioannou D, Tseriotis VS, Fouskas V, Karachrysafi S, Iosifidis E et al.

Microorganisms, 2026

62 participants · 2 citations

Abstract

Candidozyma auris (previously named Candida auris) has been recognized as a significant public health threat due to its extensive transmission in hospital settings, high mortality rates, and multidrug resistance. Evidence regarding optimal antifungal treatment in children remains limited. The present systematic review aims to synthesize available evidence on pediatric C. auris infections, focusing on antifungal treatment, resistance profiles, and clinical outcomes. A systematic search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, identifying case reports and case series of pediatric patients with confirmed C. auris infection. Data were extracted on demographics, comorbidities, infection site, antifungal therapy, and outcomes. Risk of bias was assessed using JBI Critical Appraisal checklists. Fourteen studies comprising 62 patients were included, with most cases being bloodstream infections. C. auris showed widespread fluconazole resistance and variable susceptibility to amphotericin B. Echinocandins were the most commonly used agents, generally associated with survival. Overall mortality was 35%, similar to that reported for adults. Combination therapy showed numerically higher survival, although given the small sample size and heterogeneity of treatment regimens, no comparative inferences can be made. Pediatric C. auris infections mirror adult patterns of antifungal resistance and mortality. Echinocandins remain first line therapy; however, the emergence of…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 62 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free