Evidence Hub

Return-to-Sport Outcomes and Psychological Readiness to Return to Sport After Revision Compared to the Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Manojlovic M, Milankov V, Roklicer R, Trivic T, Veraksa A, Bianco A, Drid P

Sports medicine - open, 2026

Abstract

Background: The existing body of evidence referring to the return-to-sport (RTS) outcomes and psychological readiness to return to sport after revision compared to the primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction has not yet been comprehensively synthesized.

Objective: To examine RTS outcomes and psychological readiness to return to sport after revision compared to the primary ACL reconstruction.

Methods: A comprehensive search of Web of Science, EMBASE, and PubMed was carried out up to November 15, 2024. Observational studies that compared revision and primary ACL reconstruction regarding RTS outcomes and psychological readiness to return to sport were considered adequate for inclusion. The Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation were used to assess methodological quality as well as the overall strength and quality of evidence of involved studies, respectively.

Results: A total of 19 studies fulfilled the eligibility criteria and were included in the quantitative analysis. There were 3209 athletes with a history of revision and primary ACL reconstruction (mean age: 26.0 ± 6.5 years; 78% males). The main findings indicated that individuals who were subjected to revision ACL reconstruction had slightly lower odds of RTS (-6%; odds ratio (OR) = 0.66 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.49 to 0.89]), slightly lower odds of RTS at the preinjury level of competition (-5%; OR = 0.52 [95% CI 0.36…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free