Evidence Hub

Intraoperative indocyanine green versus clinical assessment for prevention of free flap failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Faulkner L, Smith D, Liu S

JPRAS open, 2026

Abstract

Background: Both total and partial flap failure are complications of free-tissue transfer surgery associated with significant morbidity, reoperation burden, and healthcare costs. This meta-analysis evaluates whether intraoperative indocyanine green fluorescence angiography (ICG-FA) differs from clinical assessment in preventing total and partial flap loss in free flap surgery.

Methods: MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were searched from inception to 17th February 2026. Key search terms included free flap, free tissue transfer, indocyanine green, and fluorescence angiography. Sensitivity analysis was carried out using a leave-one-out approach. Risk of bias was assessed using ROBINS-I for non-randomised studies, and Cochrane RoB-2 for randomised trials. The analysis was pre-registered on PROSPERO (CRD420261309021).

Results: Eight studies were included in the final analysis, totalling 2179 free-flap procedures, 1098 of which were controls. Controlled studies comparing intraoperative ICG-FA to clinical assessment produced 90% reduction in odds for partial failure (OR 0.10, 95% CI: 0.04, 0.26; p < 0.01), 41% reduction for total failure (OR 0.59, 95% CI: 0.35, 0.97; p = 0.04), and 53% reduction for requirement of reoperation (OR 0.47, 95% CI: 0.25, 0.88; p = 0.02).

Conclusion: Intraoperative ICG-FA was associated with reduced odds of partial and total flap loss, as well as reoperation, compared with conventional clinical assessment. These findings…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free