Evidence Hub

Global and regional mortality rate statistics of mpox (formerly monkeypox): a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis

Vasudevan SS, Kandrikar TY, Cooner P, Jeswani BM, Batarseh SF, Sayed A, Yadav A, Pitliya A et al.

Pathogens and global health, 2025

47,311 participants · 7 citations

Abstract

The mortality trends associated with the mpox virus (MPXV) are not well defined. This study aims to systematically assess the mortality rate of mpox and its stratification across different geographical locations. Comprehensive review of articles from the PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science databases up to June 2025, focusing on studies reporting mortality rates among patients diagnosed with mpox. A random-effects proportional meta-analysis assessed global and regional mpox mortality rates and their geographical variations. Sensitivity analysis using one-study removal method and meta-regression analyses were conducted. Out of 4,098 records, 30 articles met the selection criteria, comprising a total of 47,311 patients diagnosed with mpox. The pooled global mpox mortality rate was 3.1% (95% CI: 1.6%-5.9%). Mortality was significantly higher before 2016 at 11.4% (95% CI: 5.8%-21.1%), compared to 2.4% (95% CI: 1.2%-4.7%) during 2016-2025, and declined further in the post-COVID era to 1.5% (95% CI: 0.7%-3.4%). Mortality was markedly elevated among individuals with HIV co-infection (83.8%; 95% CI: 74.0%-90.5%). Regionally, mortality was highest in Africa (6.3%) and lowest in Europe (0.1%). Among studies conducted in endemic regions, a notable temporal decline was also observed, with mortality decreasing from 11.4% before 2016 to 4.1% during 2016-2025. Meta-regression identified year of publication as a significant predictor of mortality (p = 0.028), indicating improved…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 47,311 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free