Evidence Hub

Gastroduodenal artery aneurysm/ pseudoaneurysm: a systematic review of reported cases

Lee YT, Hsu CC, Chen KT

PeerJ, 2025

224 participants · 5 citations

Abstract

Background: This systematic review and meta-analysis investigated the clinical characteristics of patients with gastroduodenal artery aneurysm (GDA), identified risk factors associated with poor clinical outcomes, and elucidated potential differences between various GDA etiologies.

Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted from January 2000 to October 2023 in the PubMed, EMBASE, and Google Scholar databases. The analysis focused on extracting data regarding clinical presentations, diagnostic modalities, and patient outcomes.

Results: This meta-analysis included data from 224 patients derived from 207 case reports spanning 47 countries over a 23-year period. The majority of patients presented with comorbidity (85.3%) and had a predisposing factor for GDA (71.9%). The diagnostic accuracy of the three most common diagnostic investigations-namely angiography, abdominal computed tomography, and ultrasound-was 100.0%, 86.2%, and 59.6%, respectively. Transarterial embolization (75.0%) and surgery (24.1%) were the two most common therapeutic approaches. Emergent treatment for GDA was necessary in 31.7% of patients. Notably, hemostasis was achieved after the initial treatment attempt in 82.6% of patients. The in-hospital mortality rate was 6.7%, with complications occurring in 16.1% of cases. A higher percentage of patients with a complicated hospital course were subjected to observation management and presented with shock during hospitalization.

Conclusions: Patients…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 224 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free