Evidence Hub

A Multicenter, International Collaborative Study for AJCC-Staging of Retinoblastoma: Metastasis-Associated Mortality

A. Tomar, P. Finger, B. Gallie, A. Mallipatna, T. Kivelä, Cheng-Yue Zhang, Jun-Yang Zhao, Matthew W. Wilson et al.

Ophthalmology (Rochester, Minn.), 2020

2,190 participants · 46 citations

Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the ability of the 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Cancer Staging Manual to estimate metastatic and mortality rates for children with retinoblastoma(RB).

DESIGN

International, multicenter, registry-based retrospective case series PARTICIPANTS: 2190 patients from 18 ophthalmic oncology centers from 13 countries over 6 continents.

METHODS

Patient-specific data fields for RB were designed by participating eye cancer specialists. All RB patients with adequate records to allow tumor staging by the AJCC criteria and follow-up for metastatic disease were studied.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Metastasis-related 5- and 10-year survival data after initial tumor staging were estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method depending on AJCC clinical (cTNM) and pathological (pTNM) tumor, node, metastasis category and age, tumor laterality, and presence of heritable trait.

RESULTS

Of the 2190 patients, the records of 2085 patients(95.2%) with 2905 eyes were complete. The median age at diagnosis was 17.0 months. 1260 (65.4%) had unilateral RB. Amongst the 2085 patients, tumor categories were cT1a in 55 (2.6%), cT1b 168 (8.1%), cT2a 197 (9.4%), cT2b 812 (38.9%), cT3 835 (40.0%) and cT4 in 18 (0.9%) patients. Of these, 1397 eyes in 1353 patients(48.1%) were treated with enucleation. One hundred and nine patients (5.2%) developed metastases and died. The median time(n=92) from diagnosis to metastasis was 9.50 months. The 5- year Kaplan-Meier cumulative…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case series, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health. Reported size: 2,190 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free