Evidence Hub

Atypical genital mpox mimicking a sexually transmitted infection with secondary Staphylococcus aureus infection: A case report

Vadner DJ, Bailey M, Smith S

IDCases, 2026

1 citation

Abstract

Introduction: Mpox is an Orthopoxvirus infection with evolving clinical presentations, including genital-dominant disease that can resemble common sexually transmitted infections (STIs). Secondary bacterial superinfection is uncommon but may alter lesion morphology and delay diagnosis.

Case presentation: A 64-year-old unhoused heterosexual male presented with a two-week history of painful, malodorous groin ulcers after unprotected intercourse. Lesions began as groin-confined vesicles and later spread to the face and peri-auricular area. Because of ulceration, purulence, and sexual exposure, initial evaluation focused on more common sexually transmitted infections, all of which tested negative. Dermatology was consulted when the eruption showed umbilicated vesiculopustules at uniform developmental stages. Punch biopsies demonstrated neutrophilic pustules consistent with Orthopoxvirus infection, and PCR confirmed mpox. During hospitalization, several lesions became purulent with foul odor; culture grew methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus. Linezolid therapy produced rapid improvement.

Discussion: This case demonstrates genital-dominant mpox in a heterosexual male, a less commonly reported demographic, and highlights how lesion morphology may mimic bacterial or viral STIs. Bacterial superinfection can obscure classic diagnostic features, contribute to malodor and purulence, and delay recognition. PCR remains essential for confirmation, particularly when presentation…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free