Evidence Hub

An Atypical Presentation of Culture-Negative Cryptococcal Meningitis in an Immunocompetent Host With Prior Stroke: A Case Report

Ting JSF, Yerramilli A, Clarke F, Wong S, Sehu M

Case reports in infectious diseases, 2025

Abstract

Cryptococcal meningitis commonly presents with acute symptoms such as fever and signs of raised intracranial pressure and usually occurs in immunocompromised hosts. A 55-year-old woman presented with worsening cognitive decline, gait disturbance and recurrent falls. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain revealed a prior stroke and ventriculomegaly. A lumbar puncture (LP) showed normal opening pressure. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis revealed pleocytosis with raised protein and reduced glucose. Cryptococcal antigen in the CSF was positive; however, Cryptococcus was not cultured. The immunodeficiency screen was unremarkable. She was treated with intravenous liposomal amphotericin B and oral flucytosine induction, followed by oral fluconazole consolidation and maintenance. Her cognition and mobility improved markedly after treatment. This case illustrates an uncommon presentation of cryptococcal meningitis and highlights the need to consider this diagnosis in atypical presentations. Culture negativity complicates the determination of optimal treatment duration. This case also highlights the utility of the lateral flow assay (LFA) in diagnosing cryptococcal meningitis.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free