Evidence Hub

Efficacy and safety of reduning injection for severe pneumonia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Yan Wang, Baichuan Xu, Peng Zhang, Su-qin Li, Yang Xie

Frontiers in Pharmacology, 2025

1,897 participants · 5 citations

Abstract

Objectives Reduning (RDN) injection is a traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) extract injection commonly used as an adjunct therapy for severe pneumonia (SP) in clinical practice in China; however, further validation is required. This study aims to systematically assess the efficacy and safety of RDN injection in treating SP. Methods The study was conducted using the data from CNKI, WanFang, VIP, SinoMed, PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases from their inception to 6 April 2024. We collected randomized controlled trials on the treatment of SP using RDN injection, and used Review Manager (version 5.3) for meta analysis. The primary outcomes was clinical efficacy. We used the Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment Tool 2 (RoB 2) to assess the risk of bias for each study. Results A total of 1,897 patients with SP from 22 studies were included. The meta-analysis results showed that the combination of RDN injection and conventional treatment or antibiotic treatment for patients with SP was superior to traditional and antibiotic treatments alone in terms of clinical efficacy [risk ratio = 1.25%; 95% confidence interval (CI) (1.20, 1.30); p < 0.00001], fever reduction time [mean difference (MD) = −1.55 days; 95% CI (−1.91, −1.18); p < 0.00001], cough disappearance time [MD = −1.97 days; 95% CI (−2.63, −1.31); p < 0.00001], lung rales disappearance time [MD = −2.39 days; 95% CI (−3.09, −1.70); p < 0.00001], chest X-ray improvement time [MD = −2.73 days; 95% CI…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 1,897 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free