Evidence Hub

Case Report: Navigating novel therapies and systemic barriers in ovarian clear cell carcinoma through a complete response to lenvatinib, pembrolizumab, and SFRT

Hobson J, Garda AE, Ticku J, Stockham A

Frontiers in oncology, 2025

Abstract

Ovarian clear cell carcinoma (OCCC) is a rare and chemoresistant histology known for having a poor prognosis and limited treatment options. Novel therapies offer hope, but come at a significant cost, with patients facing financial toxicity, inequitable access, and systemic barriers inherent to our current cancer care infrastructure. Utilizing a case of complete pathologic response to Lenvatinib, pembrolizumab, and spatially fractionated radiotherapy (SFRT) in metastatic OCCC after overcoming numerous individual and systemic barriers, we address the challenges surrounding access and innovation in cancer treatment, while simultaneously adding evidence to support these novel therapies in OCCC treatment. While acknowledging the role of expanded access programs and right-to-try pathways, we address broader issues surrounding restrictive trial criteria, inequitable resource distribution, and cancer as a chronic disease state, asking the question: how do we develop and disseminate novel therapies while addressing toxicities in today's healthcare system?

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free