Efficacy and safety of airway clearance techniques in Chinese adult patients with pneumonia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
Objective This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to synthesize the available evidence from Chinese randomized controlled trials to evaluate the efficacy and safety of airway clearance techniques compared to conventional treatment in adult patients with pneumonia, including stroke-associated pneumonia, severe viral pneumonia, and severe pneumonia requiring mechanical ventilation. Methods We systematically searched PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, CNKI, and Wanfang databases from inception to January 1, 2026, for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing airway clearance techniques plus conventional treatment vs. conventional treatment alone. Two reviewers independently conducted study selection, data extraction, and quality assessment. Data were pooled using a random-effects model in Stata, with between-study heterogeneity evaluated. Results Eleven randomized controlled trials were included. Meta-analysis showed airway clearance techniques significantly increased treatment effectiveness (OR 3.83, 95% CI 2.04–7.16; I2 = 0%) and reduced complications (OR 0.16, 95% CI 0.07–0.41; I2 = 0%). They also improved arterial oxygen saturation (SMD 1.71, 95% CI 1.24–2.19), albeit with considerable heterogeneity (I2 = 76.2%). No significant effect was found on the mMRC Dyspnea Score (SMD−3.64, 95% CI −7.45–0.18), with very high heterogeneity (I2 = 98.1%). Conclusion In conclusion, this meta-analysis provides hypothesis-generating evidence that airway clearance…
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Severe clinical outcomes of COVID-19 associated with proton pump inhibitors: a nationwide cohort study with propensity score matching
- Penicillins for Treatment of Pneumococcal Pneumonia: Does In Vitro Resistance Really Matter?
- Thiophenes—Naturally Occurring Plant Metabolites: Biological Activities and In Silico Evaluation of Their Potential as Cathepsin D Inhibitors
- Inhalable Mannosylated Rifampicin–Curcumin Co-Loaded Nanomicelles with Enhanced In Vitro Antimicrobial Efficacy for an Optimized Pulmonary Tuberculosis Therapy
- Development and validation of microbial bioassay for quantification of Levofloxacin in pharmaceutical preparations
- Association between cord blood 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations and respiratory tract infections in the first 6 months of age in a Korean population: a birth cohort study (COCOA)
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.