Evidence Hub

Determining the efficacy of N-acetyl cysteine in treatment of pneumonia in COVID-19 hospitalized patients: A meta-analysis

Mohamed E. A. Shaaban, Ahmed Mohamed

International Journal of Clinical Medical Research, 2023

20,553 participants · 23 citations

Abstract

Background

Most patients infected with COVID-19 experienced cold-like symptoms. Some other patients developed more serious symptoms such as pneumonia. N-Acetylcysteine ​​(NAC) is known to be effective against acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) due to its anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties. The effect of NAC on hospitalized COVID-19 patients was unknown. Therefore, this meta-analysis aimed to establish a relationship between the effects of NAC and non-NAC protocols in inpatients with COVID-19.

Method

By March 2022, a systemic review was conducted to assess the effects of NAC and non-NAC in inpatients with COVID-19. The clinical trials were identified in 20553 subjects admitted with COVID-19 at baseline. 2909 was treated with NAC and 17644 was treated without NAC. This study attempts to compare the effects of NAC and non-NAC in COVID-19 patients hospitalized with pneumonia. Statistical analysis uses the dichotomous method as a tool for odds ratio (OR) at 95% confidence interval (CI) to assess the effectiveness of NAC and non-NAC in COVID-19 patients hospitalized with pneumonia in random or fixed-effect model.

Results

Patients managed with NAC had fewer days in the ICU (OR, 2.79; 95% CI, -1.11-6.69, p = 0.16), lower mortality (OR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.40-1.20, p = 0.19), and fewer number needed mechanical ventilation (OR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.25-2.21, p = 0.59) compared with non-NAC in COVID-19 subjects hospitalized with pneumonia.

Conclusion

NAC has decreased the days…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 20,553 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free