Evidence Hub

Systemic Corticosteroids in Children With Pneumonia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Maria Geropeppa, Panagiota Tsagkli, I. Papadatou, Vasiliki Efthymiou, Alfredo Tagarro, E. Galanakis, V. Spoulou

The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal, 2025

75 participants · 5 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Corticosteroids are effective adjunct treatment for certain infectious diseases. However, their role in children with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) remains unclear. We aim to assess the efficacy and safety of adjunct corticosteroid therapy in pediatric CAP.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted on MEDLINE to retrieve studies assessing systemic corticosteroid therapy, given alongside antimicrobial regimens, in pediatric CAP (last search date December 31, 2024). Literature screening, quality assessment, and data extraction were conducted by 2 independent reviewers. Heterogeneity and publication bias were detected by I2 and Egger's tests. The data were pooled using the random-effects model for the conduction of meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Twenty-two articles (N = 75.353) of 3799 screened studies were included in the systematic review; 7 of 22 studies providing data on length of hospital stay (LOS) and duration of fever for corticosteroid-treated versus control patients were included in the meta-analysis. Significant heterogeneity was observed regarding the regimen, dosage and duration of corticosteroid therapy. Regarding meta-analysis, LOS and time to defervescence were significantly decreased in patients receiving corticosteroids compared to controls in randomized clinical trials (Cohen's d value = -0.59, 95% confidence interval: -0.96 to -0.23, P = 0.001, I2 = 52.6%; Cohen's d value =-0.54, 95% confidence interval: -0.83 to -0.26, P <…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 75 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free