Evidence Hub

Strategies for preventing ventilator-associated pneumonia in adults in the Middle East and North Africa Region: A systematic review and meta-analysis

O. Abousaad, Aisha Al-Ajji, Noor Abouazab, Adel Aljoaid, J. Sreedharan

Annals of Thoracic Medicine, 2025

3 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is a common complication in intensive care units (ICUs), particularly in patients undergoing prolonged mechanical ventilation. VAP rates vary significantly across regions, with the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region experiencing relatively high incidences. This study systematically reviews and analyses the efficacy of various VAP prevention strategies in the adult population of the MENA region. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, and CINAHL) were searched for studies from January 2004 to May 2024 that investigated VAP prevention strategies in adult ICU patients in the MENA region. Data extraction and quality assessment were performed by multiple independent reviewers. Meta-analysis was carried out using the DerSimonian and Laird random effect models. RESULTS: A total of 10 randomized clinical trials conducted in Iran and Tunisia were included. The studies evaluated various interventions, including respiratory care programs, oral care protocols, and tracheal suction techniques. Significant reductions in VAP incidence were observed with interventions such as aerosolized colistin and comprehensive oral care (e.g., clove mouthwash). However, certain interventions, such as ondansetron and N-acetylcysteine, did not yield significant benefits. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis highlights effective VAP prevention strategies in…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free