Evidence Hub

Sexual adjustment in ileostomy patients before and after conversion to continent ileostomy

Nilsson LO, Kock NG, Kylberg F, Myrvold HE, Palselius I

Diseases of the colon and rectum, 1981

48 participants · 54 citations

Abstract

Questionnaires were sent to 48 ileostomy patients to evaluate the effects on sexual life of an ileostomate before and after conversion to a continent ileostomy. Forty-two patients (88 per cent) returned their questionnaires. Ninety-eight per cent of the patients had sometimes felt embarrassed, uncertain or inhibited by the conventional stoma, whereas only 24 per cent had these reactions after conversion to a continent ileostomy. About 80 per cent of the patients thought that the conventional ileostomy disturbed their sexual life because of the risk of leakage, odor, noise or such inhibitory influence to the continent ileostomy. Four men (31 per cent) and 15 women (52 per cent) reported that their sexual activity was reduced or absent when they had their conventional ileostomy. After conversion to a continent ileostomy all but one man and one woman considered their sexual activity to be normal. One-third of the patients claimed that the partner was embarrassed by the conventional ileostomy, but no partner admitted a negative reaction towards the continent ileostomy. Conversion to a continent ileostomy improved the quality of sexual life in about 85 per cent of both men and women.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 48 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free