Evidence Hub

Special considerations in the endourologic management of stones in continent urinary reservoirs

Patel H, Bellman GC

Journal of endourology, 1995

Abstract

To various degrees, all continent pouch designs are subject to stones, which often are infected. We report on the endourologic management of large stone burdens in three types of continent reservoirs. Stone in a UCLA and a Kock pouch were managed endoscopically, and stones in an augmented pouch with a Mitrofanoff valve were managed percutaneously. Recommendations are made with regard to the optimal endourologic management of significant stone burdens in each of the common continent urinary reservoirs.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free