Evidence Hub

Utilization of ileal conduit in construction of continent urinary reservoir

Oesterling JE, Gearhart JP

Urology, 1990

Abstract

Two patients with ileal conduits underwent planned urinary undiversion; in both patients, the previously constructed ileal conduit was utilized to augment the continent urinary reservoir. Both patients are totally continent with stable upper urinary tracts; neither individual suffers from diarrhea or intestinal absorption abnormalities. This variation in the construction of the continent urinary reservoir allows for the usage of less terminal ileum, and as a result, the risk of intractable diarrhea as well as folate and vitamin B12 malabsorption should be diminished. The criteria that must be met to utilize the ileal conduit in the construction of the continent urinary reservoir include: (1) adequate remaining conduit length after mobilization, and (2) a normal-appearing conduit with sufficient mesenteric length after mobilization.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free