Evidence Hub

Usefulness of catheter pyelography in ileal diversions and continent bladder replacement after radical cystectomy

da Luz Junior P, Palou Redorta J, Iglesias Mateo J, Villavicencio Mavrich H

Archivos espanoles de urologia, 1992

51 participants

Abstract

Transcatheter ascending pyelography is commonly performed in the post-operative evaluation of patients submitted to ileal diversion or continent bladder replacement after radical cystectomy. The present study investigated the usefulness of this procedure in the control of these patients. Of 51 patients that underwent cutaneous ileal diversion, the IVP revealed a leak of the contrast medium in only one case (1.9%). Of the 18 patients that received a continent neobladder, radiologic signs of changes were detected in 6 cases (33.3%). The complications of the IVP in our patients were fever in 26 patients (37.7%) and septicemia in one patient (1.45%). Considering the information obtained and the rate of morbility, we believe that ascending pyelography through catheters is not justified in the routine post-operative control of patients who have undergone radical cystectomy and ileal diversion. However, it appears to be a useful procedure in those cases that have undergone bladder replacement and/or continent diversion procedures.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 51 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free