Evidence Hub

Pregnancy and delivery in patients with urinary diversion through the continent ileal reservoir

Akerlund S, Bokström H, Jonsson O, Kock NG, Wennergren M

Surgery, gynecology & obstetrics, 1991

Abstract

The social and psychologic sequelae after external urinary diversion are known to be fewer in patients with urinary diversion through the continent ileal reservoir (Kock pouch) compared with those with diversion through the incontinent ileal conduit. Therefore, in young female patients treated surgically with urinary diversion through the continent ileal reservoir, a number of pregnancies can be expected. We report herein the results of four pregnancies in three women with this type of reservoir. All deliveries were vaginal. One patient showed urinary obstruction at the end of the pregnancy and delivery was induced. This particular infant was treated with phototherapy because of hyperbilirubinemia; the other three infants were mature. No damage to renal function was noted and revisional surgical treatment of the reservoir was not necessary in any. Consequently, pregnancy is not contraindicated after urinary diversion through the continent ileal reservoir (Koch pouch).

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free