Evidence Hub

The global burden of climate-sensitive health impacts: a systematic review of mortality, morbidity, and economic costs

Rahamtalla BM, Medani IE, Hakami AM, Chourasia UH, Salih A, Hashim KN

The Pan African medical journal, 2026

Abstract

Rising greenhouse gas emissions are intensifying heatwaves, wildfires, extreme rainfall, and sea-level rise, reshaping global health outcomes. However, the full multisystem burden remains insufficiently synthesized. This systematic review quantifies global climate-sensitive health impacts, identifies vulnerable populations, and evaluates adaptation strategies. We searched seven databases and grey literature (2000-2025), including studies linking climate exposures to health outcomes. Dual screening, risk-of-bias assessment (ROBINS-I, ROB 2), meta-analysis, meta-regression, and GRADE certainty grading were applied. Sixty-five studies were included. Non-optimal temperatures were associated with 5.08 million annual deaths (2000-2019). Heat increased all-cause mortality by 3.3% per 1°C above local optimum, while compound heat-ozone events increased cardiovascular mortality by 5.7%. Wildfire smoke contributed to ~339,000 premature deaths annually and a 6% increase in myocardial infarction admissions per 10 µg/m3PM2.5. Climate-sensitive vectors may expose 1.3 billion people to Aedes-borne diseases by 2050. Heat-related labor losses reached 5.3% of global work hours (~US$671 billion in 2020). Climate-related anxiety/depression prevalence was 24%. Only 27% of World Health Organization (WHO) member States report fully funded health adaptation plans. Early warning systems and deep decarbonization could reduce mortality by up to 42% and avert >160,000 deaths annually. Evidence indicates…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free