Evidence Hub

Effects of Tanreqing injection against ventilator-associated pneumonia: a meta-analysis and systematic review of clinical studies

Po-Chen Li, Yang Wu, Dan-Xia Ge, Ruyi Xu, Qian-Ping Zhang, Yu-Jiao Li, Lingyao Zhang, HsuanChieh Peng et al.

Frontiers in Pharmacology, 2025

1,446 participants · 3 citations

Abstract

Objective Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) frequently results in difficulties with weaning, high mortality rates, and is often caused by drug-resistant pathogens, emphasizing the critical importance of effective treatment. The efficacy and safety of Tanreqing injection (TRQI) in the treatment of VAP patients have been demonstrated, but further validation is required. The objective of this study is to synthesize the findings of clinical research on TRQI for the treatment of VAP, thereby providing clinical evidence for its effectiveness and importance. Methods A comprehensive search of eight databases was conducted, covering all records up to 30 August 2024. The data were extracted, quality-assessed, and analyzed rigorously. The methodological quality of the included studies was evaluated using the RoB-2 tool. The statistical analyses were conducted using RevMan 5.4 software, with either a fixed-effect or random-effect model employed as appropriate. The evidence quality of the included literature was evaluated using Grade pro 3.6.1 software. Results A total of 20 clinical studies, comprising a total of 1,446 patients, were included in the review. The meta-analysis of these studies demonstrated that TRQI significantly improved inflammatory markers (CRP, PCT, WBC) (P < 0.00001) and reduced the duration of antibiotic use (P < 0.00001). Furthermore, the intervention resulted in a shorter duration of ventilator usage (P < 0.0001), an increased initial weaning success rate (P =…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 1,446 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free