Evidence Hub

Nasal Aesthetic Preferences Across Populations: A Systematic Review of Cultural, Ethnic, and Generational Trends

Khademi Mansour HR, Malik A, North AS, Joshi A

Aesthetic surgery journal, 2026

1 citation

Abstract

Nasal aesthetics are central to rhinoplasty outcomes, yet ideals of beauty vary considerably across cultures, ethnicities, and generations. Current evidence is fragmented, often Eurocentric, and lacks a comprehensive synthesis. This systematic review aimed to evaluate nasal aesthetic preferences and their implications for clinical practice. The protocol was prospectively registered on PROSPERO (CRD420251009102). Systematic searches of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and PsycINFO were conducted from inception to June 2025. Eligible studies assessed nasal aesthetic preferences in adult (≥18 years) populations. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS), NOS-xs, Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations, and Appraisal tool for Cross-Sectional Studies tools were used to guide critical appraisal, and findings were synthesized narratively. A total of 2881 records were screened, yielding 31 studies with 25,382 respondents. Preferences demonstrated marked regional variation: North American Caucasians favored a slight dorsal scoop with mild underprojection, whereas East Asian/Middle Eastern groups preferred a straight dorsum with more obtuse nasolabial angles. Chinese cohorts most frequently selected radix positions at the pupil, Japanese studies reported stable nasofacial angles of 30° to 33°, and Syrian findings converged around ∼31°. Generational trends indicated Millennials and Generation Z favored longer, straighter noses with augmented radix and reduced…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free