Evidence Hub

Genetic diversity of Toxoplasma gondii isolates from members of the families camelidae and equidae worldwide: a systematic review

Hataminejad M, Lashaki EK, Behboudi E, Esmaeili B, Ahmadi S, Galeh TM

Irish veterinary journal, 2026

Abstract

Toxoplasma gondii is an apicomplexan parasite with a global distribution and significant public health and veterinary treatment implications. The present systematic review collates worldwide information on the genotypic diversity of T. gondii isolates infecting Camelidae (camels, alpacas, llamas, etc.) and Equidae (horses, donkeys, zebras, mules, etc.) and highlights their potential role as sentinels of environmental contamination and zoonotic spread. An exhaustive literature search of six electronic databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, ProQuest, Science Direct, and Google Scholar) from inception to 20 July 2025 identified 20 relevant studies reporting genotypic information from 103 isolates. The present analysis reveals key geographical differences: atypical genotypes predominated in the Americas (88.2%) and Africa (83.3%), reflecting high regional diversity. Asian isolates featured the greatest complexity and presented mostly mixed infections (61.1%), and the China I genotype (ToxoDB #9) emerged as the dominant individual lineage. European isolates presented a very separate profile by mainly consisting of Type III (57.1%), but atypical genotypes were also reported. These findings indicate that Camelidae and Equidae hosts carry rich and diverse populations of T. gondii that closely mirror local strains in their environment rather than classical clonal Types. The co-existence of genotypes linked with human virulence (e.g., Type I and China I) in these food animals…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free