Evidence Hub

Epidemiology of Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphomas: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 16,953 Patients

G. Dobos, A. Pohrt, C. Ram-Wolff, C. Lebbé, J. Bouaziz, M. Battistella, M. Bagot, A. de Masson

Cancers, 2020

16,953 participants · 126 citations

Abstract

Simple Summary Cutaneous T-cell lymphomas (CTCL) are rare malignant diseases. In this study we have compared the cutaneous lymphoma registries of different countries, which included information on at least 100 patients. The frequencies of each CTCL subtype were compared within and between continents. We found that the registries differed importantly in terms of size and quality. Some rare CTCL subtypes, such as NK/T-cell lymphoma or subcutaneous panniculitis-like lymphomas, were more frequent in Asian countries, while others were evenly distributed. We discuss possible reasons for this and provide suggestions on how to build future CTCL registries. Abstract Cutaneous T-cell lymphomas (CTCL) are a heterogenous group of rare diseases. Many studies have reported on local epidemiology or geographic clustering, however we lack information from a global perspective. A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted in Medline and the Cochrane Library based on a previously registered protocol and according to the preferred reporting of items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA). We selected publications that enrolled at least 100 patients with primary cutaneous lymphomas according to the current classifications. The relative frequencies (proportions) of subtypes were compared between studies and geographic regions in a meta-analysis. In total, 26 studies met our inclusion criteria, reporting on altogether 16,953 patients. Within primary cutaneous lymphomas, CTCL…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 16,953 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free