Evidence Hub

Outcome of adrenalectomy for unilateral primary aldosteronism: International consensus and remission rates

T. Williams, J. Lenders, P. Mulatero, J. Burrello, M. Rottenkolber, C. Adolf, F. Satoh, L. Amar et al.

The Lancet Diabetes and Endocrinology, 2017

30 participants · 762 citations

Abstract

Background Although unilateral primary aldosteronism is the most common surgically correctable cause of hypertension there are no standard criteria to classify surgical outcomes. Methods The Primary Aldosteronism Surgical Outcome study reached consensus by an international panel of 31 experts, including 6 endocrine surgeons, using the Delphi method. On the basis of standardised criteria, remission (complete, partial, absent) rates for clinical and biochemical outcomes were determined in retrospective cohorts (n=30-99) of consecutive patients unilaterally adrenalectomized based on adrenal venous sampling from 12 tertiary centres in 9 countries over 4 continents. Findings Consensus was reached for 6 criteria of clinical and biochemical outcome and 2 recommendations for follow-up. Complete clinical success was achieved in 37% of patients, with a wide variance (17-62%), and partial clinical success in an additional 47% (35-66%); complete biochemical success was seen in 94% (83-100%). Female patients had a higher likelihood of complete clinical success (OR=2.25; 95% CI, 1.40-3.62) and clinical benefit (complete + partial clinical success) (OR=2.89; 95% CI, 1.49-5.59). Younger patients had a higher likelihood of complete clinical success (OR=0.95 per extra year; 95% CI, 0.93-0.98) and clinical benefit (OR=0.95 per extra year; 95% CI, 0.92-0.98). Higher levels of pre-operative medication were associated with lower levels of complete clinical success. Interpretation Standardised…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 30 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free