Evidence Hub

Low-dose trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole for prophylaxis of Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia in HIV-uninfected patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Hui-Bin Huang, Jiaheng Shi, Yan-Ge Hu, Yi-bing Zhu, Da-xing Yu

Frontiers in Pharmacology, 2025

4,890 participants · 2 citations

Abstract

Background Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) is the recommended first-line prophylactic agent against Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP). However, the standard regimen is often discontinued due to its drug-associated adverse events (AEs), especially in immunocompromised patients without HIV infection. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of a low-dose regimen of TMP-SMX against PJP prophylaxis in patients without infection. Methods We searched PubMed, Embase, Wanfang, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Web of Science, and the Cochrane database for relevant articles from inception to 15 October 2024. Studies were included if they reported the safety and efficacy of using TMP-SMX in PJP prophylaxis in patients without HIV infection. The primary outcome was the discontinuation rate. We assessed study quality and performed sensitivity and subgroup analysis to explore potential heterogeneity among the included studies. Results Seventeen studies with 4,890 patients were included. These studies were low to modest in quality. Overall, the incidence of PJP in the included studies was rare and was similar between the low- and standard-dose groups. However, the low-dose regimen significantly reduced the risk of discontinuation rate (odds ratio [OR] = 0.38; 95% CI, 0.27–0.52; I 2 = 0%; P < 0.00001). Further sensitivity and subgroup analyses confirmed this finding. Estimation of the combined discontinuation rate for patients receiving low-dose…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 4,890 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free