Evidence Hub

Outcomes for Patients Undergoing Continent Ileostomy After a Failed Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis

Lei Lian, Victor W. Fazio, Feza H. Remzi, Bo Shen, David Dietz, Ravi Pokala Kiran

Diseases of the Colon & Rectum, 2009

44 participants · 87 citations

Abstract

PURPOSE: Continent ileostomy is considered an alternative for patients with a failed ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. The aim of this study is to investigate outcomes for patients undergoing continent ileostomy after a failed ileal pouch-anal anastomosis at our institution. METHODS: Patients undergoing continent ileostomy after a failed ileal pouch-anal anastomosis were identified from a prospectively maintained pouch database. Quality-of-life scores were obtained by telephone follow-up or office visit and were determined by the Cleveland Global Quality of Life Score. RESULTS: Sixty-four patients were identified between 1982 and 2007. Forty-two percent were male. The median age was 36.5 (range, 14-61) years. Most common diagnoses included ulcerative colitis (n = 44, 68.8%) and Crohn's disease (n = 13, 20.3%). The indication for continent ileostomy was septic pouch complications in 56.3% patients. The previous pelvic pouch was used in 16 (25%) patients. The 30-day complication rate was 31.3%. There were no perioperative deaths. Median follow-up was five years. The long-term dysfunction rate was 50%, the complication rate was 60.9%, and the revision rate 45.3%. The median revision-free interval was 2.8 years (range, 3 months to 19 years) and the retention rate of continent ileostomy was 95.3% (61 of 64). Median continent ileostomy survival time was 4.2 (range, 1-19) years. The median quality-of-life score was 0.77. CONCLUSIONS: Continent ileostomy is possible in patients wishing…

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free