Evidence Hub

Endosonography of the anal sphincters: incontinent and continent patients and healthy controls

A Schäfer, Paul Enck, T Heyer, Beate Gantke, Thomas Frieling, Heinrich Josef Lübke

PubMed, 1994

42 participants · 10 citations

Abstract

It has previously been shown that in healthy subjects anal sphincter functions as assessed by anorectal manometry and anal sphincter anatomy as measured by endoluminal ultrasound are poorly correlated. It remains to be shown, however, whether this is true for a larger series of patients with anorectal dysfunctions such as incontinence, and what is the clinical relevance of anal sonography. Anal sonography was performed in 42 consecutive patients with fecal incontinence, in 19 patients with constipation and/or anal pain, and in 15 healthy volunteers to determine anal sphincter integrity and the dorsal diameter of the internal and external anal sphincter muscles. Conventional multilumen anorectal manometry was performed in all subjects and patients to determine, among others, external and internal sphincter (EAS, IAS) performance at rest and during squeezing. It was shown that healthy subjects exhibit significantly higher muscle diameters of the IAS than both patient groups, but the EAS was similar in all groups. In 11/42 cases of incontinent patients, in 3/19 constipated patients, but in none of the controls a muscle defect of the EAS was found with sonography. Thirteen of these 14 patients were women with previous birth traumas. EAS but not IAS muscle thickness and muscle performance (squeezing and resting, respectively) were significantly correlated. Across all groups, women had smaller EAS muscle diameters than men. It is concluded, that in incontinent patients anal…

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free