Evidence Hub

Protecting larval fish at water intakes: hydraulic and biological evidence for the effectiveness of modern fish-protection screens

Ashley Boys C, Robinson W, E Doyle K, Rayner TS, McSweeney P, Baumgartner LJ

Biology open, 2025

Abstract

Water intakes entrain large numbers of fish larvae in waterways where drift coincides with large-scale extraction. While modern fish-protection screens can reduce these losses, many are not designed for larvae and were developed or evaluated primarily for juveniles and adults. This study evaluated the effectiveness of Australia's fish screen design criteria (which specify a maximum approach velocity of 0.1 m s-¹ and slot widths of 2-3 mm) for protecting drifting larval Murray cod (Maccullochella peelii). Larvae were tested in a large flume under combinations of approach velocity (0.1 or 0.2 m s-¹), slot width (2 or 3 mm), and proximity. Entrainment rose sharply with velocity; slot size had a smaller interactive effect. The most protective combination (0.1 m s-¹ and 2 mm) reduced entrainment by up to 94% relative to unscreened conditions. Three-dimensional flow measurements helped explain how velocity vectors interact to influence larval fate. The results demonstrate that Australia's current standards, although developed for juveniles, can provide strong larval protection when strictly followed, but that even modest departures can sharply increase risk. More broadly, since the criteria tested here are less conservative than those adopted in many other countries, where empirical evidence on larval behaviour does not exist, targeted research could determine whether existing guidelines warrant revision.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a experimental / empirical study, done in animal, not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free