Evidence Hub

Advancing Drug Discovery with AI: Machine and Deep Learning Strategies for Target Identification and Precision Nanomedicine

Chakraborty A, Gholap AD, Khuspe PR, Sundaram G, Webster TJ, Khalid M, Haris MS, Faiyazuddin M

International journal of nanomedicine, 2026

Abstract

The integration of machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) into drug discovery and target identification has catalyzed a paradigm shift in pharmaceutical research, enhancing efficiency and translational potential for nano-enabled therapeutics. ML models have demonstrated up to 85% accuracy in predicting drug-target interactions, whereas DL frameworks, such as convolutional neural networks (CNNs), graph neural networks (GNNs), and transformer architectures, can improve molecular property predictions by 40%. AI-driven drug discovery workflows have curtailed drug candidate attrition rates by up to 30% and accelerated discovery timelines by 20%-40%, accentuating their rising industrial and clinical impact. This critical review evaluates the transformative roles of ML and DL in the drug discovery pipeline, emphasizing their capacity to accelerate development timelines and advance precision nano medicine. We analyzed predictive modelling techniques, including quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) and absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion (ADME) predictions, which streamline the identification of viable drug candidates, including nanocarrier-enabled drug systems. Virtual screening and bioactivity prediction further refine candidate prioritization, whereas target identification and validation leverage protein-ligand interaction modelling and biological pathway analysis to ensure therapeutic specificity. Additionally, we discuss the profound impact of…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a review, done in computer models (in silico), not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free