Evidence Hub

Artificial Intelligence-Integrated Proteome-Wide Target Prioritization for Drug Discovery against Multidrug-Resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae

Ravi Kant, S. Mazumdar, Ananya Mahajan, M. Christodoulides

ACS Infectious Diseases, 2026

Abstract

Neisseria gonorrhoeae causes ∼82.4 million infections annually and is rapidly approaching an untreatable status. The pathogen has developed resistance to every antibiotic class introduced since the sulfonamide era. Ceftriaxone, the last WHO- and CDC-recommended empirical therapy, is now compromised by high-level resistance in extensively drug-resistant lineages reported across multiple continents. No licensed vaccine exists, and no antibiotic with a novel mechanism has been introduced for this pathogen in over 40 years. Conventional drug discovery is too slow and insufficiently resistance-aware to address this escalating threat. In this review, we examine in silico proteome-wide target fishing as a rapid, systematic approach. The approach applies six biologically informed filters to the N. gonorrhoeae core proteome: core-genome definition, host-homology exclusion, essentiality screening, metabolic chokepoint identification, subcellular localization, and resistance-aware prioritization. Across data sets spanning 12–69 clinical strains, this pipeline reduces 2000–12,300 protein-coding sequences to 12–30 high-confidence targets. An integrated artificial intelligence (AI)/machine learning (ML) scoring layer further ranks candidates using sequence features, AlphaFold2 structures, protein–protein interaction networks, and genotype–phenotype data from ∼20,000 clinical isolates. Five targets showed consistent cross-study prioritization: LpxC, MurA, FabI, DapD, and NGFG_RS03485. Of…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a review, done in computer models (in silico), not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free