Evidence Hub

Effect of a hepatitis A vaccination campaign during a hepatitis A outbreak in Taiwan, 2015-2017: a modeling study

Kuan-Yin Lin, Hsin-Yun Sun, Yi-Hsuan Chen, Yi-Chun Lo, Szu-Min Hsieh, W. Sheng, Yu-Chung Chuang, Sung-Ching Pan et al.

Clinical Infectious Diseases, 2020

26 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Beginning from 2015-2016, unprecedented large outbreaks of acute hepatitis A predominantly affecting men who have sex with men (MSM) re-emerged across the continents. We assessed the impact of an early initiated hepatitis A virus (HAV) vaccination campaign that targeted HIV-positive MSM during the 2015-2017 acute hepatitis A outbreak in Taiwan.

METHODS

We first ascertained the effectiveness of HAV vaccination for HIV-positive MSM, who were disproportionately affected by the outbreak, using a nested case-control study of 1,470 HIV-positive persons who were initially HAV-seronegative. We then fitted a model of HAV transmission among MSM, risk-structured by HIV status, to the actual epidemic curve of reported acute hepatitis A cases in Taiwan during 2015-2017. Risk behaviors, serosorting, and effective population size were subjected to sensitivity analyses.

RESULTS

Fifty-five cases of acute hepatitis A were matched to 220 controls. Single-dose and two-dose HAV vaccination provided protection rates of 96.1% and 97.8% among recipient HIV-positive MSM, respectively. Model fitting yielded basic reproductive number estimates of 7.26 (HIV-positive MSM) and 3.04 (HIV-negative MSM). In a counterfactual scenario without an HAV vaccination campaign, the outbreak would involve 7,153 hepatitis A cases during 2015-2017 in contrast to the 1,352 actually observed cases. We therefore estimated that the HAV vaccination campaign averted 80.7% (sensitivity analysis: 48.8%-92.7%) of…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case-control, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free