Efficacy of Kegan Liyan oral liquid vs. Lianhuaqingwen capsules for patients with mild COVID-19: a double-blinded, randomized, controlled, non-inferiority trial
Abstract
Background Traditional Chinese medicine has been used for Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) as a therapeutic option. Lianhuaqingwen capsules (LHQW) are well-recognized for their efficacy, while Kegan Liyan oral liquid (KGLY), widely used for influenza treatment, has emerged as a promising candidate for COVID-19 therapy. This trial aims to assess whether KGLY is non-inferior to LHQW in treating mild COVID-19. Methods A total of 127 participants (63 in KGLY group and 64 in LHQW group) were randomly allocated to receive either KGLY therapy or LHQW therapy in a 1:1 ratio. The treatment was given for 7 days, and the follow-up period was 3 days. Outcome measures The primary outcome was symptom remission at day 10. Secondary outcomes included symptom recovery, time to symptom remission, recovery rates and time to recovery of selected symptoms, change in visual analog scale score for selected symptoms, area under the curve of the visual analog scale score for sore throat, negative conversion of the SARS-CoV-2 infection, having a positive test result after negative conversion, and incidence of pneumonia. Results Full analysis set analysis showed that the symptom remission rate at day 10 was 60.7% with KGLY and 58.3% in LHQW (difference + 2.3 p.p., lower limit of 95% confidence interval − 14.8 p.p.), indicating non-inferiority. There were no significant differences between the groups for any secondary outcome. The occurrence of adverse events did not differ between the groups and no…
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 127 participants or records.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Severe clinical outcomes of COVID-19 associated with proton pump inhibitors: a nationwide cohort study with propensity score matching
- Penicillins for Treatment of Pneumococcal Pneumonia: Does In Vitro Resistance Really Matter?
- Thiophenes—Naturally Occurring Plant Metabolites: Biological Activities and In Silico Evaluation of Their Potential as Cathepsin D Inhibitors
- Inhalable Mannosylated Rifampicin–Curcumin Co-Loaded Nanomicelles with Enhanced In Vitro Antimicrobial Efficacy for an Optimized Pulmonary Tuberculosis Therapy
- Development and validation of microbial bioassay for quantification of Levofloxacin in pharmaceutical preparations
- Association between cord blood 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations and respiratory tract infections in the first 6 months of age in a Korean population: a birth cohort study (COCOA)
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.