Evidence Hub

Phase 1 study of talquetamab, a humanized GPRC5D x CD3 bispecific antibody, in Japanese patients with relapsed/refractory MM

Iida S, Sunami K, Ito S, Yuda J, Fujikawa E, Takamoto M, Aida K, Yamazaki H et al.

International journal of hematology, 2025

15 participants · 5 citations

Abstract

The bispecific antibody talquetamab demonstrated substantial responses in heavily pretreated relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) in the global phase 1/2 MonumenTAL-1 study. This study, evaluated the safety and efficacy of talquetamab in Japanese patients with RRMM pretreated with a proteasome inhibitor, immunomodulatory drug, and anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody. The primary endpoints were frequency and type of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and serious AEs including dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). The secondary endpoints were overall response (ORR; partial response or better), duration of, and time to response. At data cutoff, 15 patients had received subcutaneous talquetamab at three doses (Cohort 1: 135 µg/kg weekly [QW, n = 4]; Cohort 2: 400 µg/kg [QW, n = 5]; Cohort 3: 800 µg/kg [Q2W, n = 6]). No DLTs, deaths, or AE-related dose reductions/treatment discontinuation were observed. Common TEAEs were neutropenia (60.0%), lymphopenia (53.3%), and CRS (46.7%). TEAEs of clinical interest (all Grade ≤ 2) were dysgeusia, skin toxicity, nail disorder, and dry mouth. With an overall median follow-up of 9.0 months, the ORR was 60.0% (95% confidence interval 32.3%, 83.7%). Talquetamab showed substantial responses in Japanese patients with RRMM, consistent with the global MonumenTAL-1 study, supporting its potential as a new standard of care for Japanese RRMM patients.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 15 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free