Evidence Hub

Long-term follow-up of a phase 2 study of all-trans retinoic acid, arsenic trioxide, and gemtuzumab ozogamicin in acute promyelocytic leukemia

Jen WY, Marvin-Peek J, Kantarjian HM, Alvarado Y, Borthakur G, Jabbour E, Wierda W, Kadia TM et al.

Cancer, 2025

106 participants · 15 citations

Abstract

Background: All-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) and arsenic trioxide (ATO) combinations have produced excellent outcomes in patients with standard-risk acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL). Herein, the authors update their long-term results with the regimen of ATO-ATRA and gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO) in standard-risk and high-risk APL.

Methods: This was a phase 2 trial of patients with newly diagnosed APL. Induction comprised ATRA 45 mg/m2 and ATO 0.15 mg/kg daily. GO 6-9 mg/m2 was added for high-risk patients and for standard-risk patients who developed leukocytosis >10 × 109/L. Consolidation consisted of four courses of ATO-ATRA, with GO for patients who had PML::RARA persistence.

Results: One hundred forty-six patients (median age, 53.0 years; range, 19.3-83.9 years) were treated, including 106 patients (72.6%) with standard-risk APL and 40 (27.4%) with high-risk APL. GO was administered to 68 standard-risk patients (64.2%) for leukocytosis. The complete remission rate was 93.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 92.2%-98.5%). Negative measurable residual disease status was achieved in 97.1% of patients who attained complete remission. At a median follow-up of 61.8 months (95% CI, 4.7-128.4 months), the 5-year event-free survival, disease-free survival, and overall survival rates were 92.4% (95% CI, 87.9%-97.1%), 93.6% (95% CI, 89.5%-97.8%), and 93.1% (95% CI, 88.9%-97.7%), respectively. Induction mortality was 2.7%. The most common severe adverse events were elevated transaminases…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 106 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free