Evidence Hub

Artificial liver plasma adsorption improves survival in elderly patients with severe pneumonia: a retrospective cohort study

Richai Chen, Jiaqian Jin, Sai-Nan Zhang, Jiajun Wu, Qiangqiang Xiang, Xuanhao Lin, Dan-Hua Zhu, Meng-Fei Zhu

Frontiers in Medicine, 2025

151 participants

Abstract

Objective To assess the therapeutic efficacy of artificial liver plasma adsorption (ALPA) in patients with severe pneumonia. Methods This retrospective study enrolled 151 patients meeting severe pneumonia diagnostic criteria who were admitted to the intensive care unit at Shulan Hospital, Hangzhou, China, between January 2020 and December 2024. Participants were allocated to either: (1) the ALPA intervention group (n = 56) receiving artificial liver plasma adsorption (ALPA) therapy, or (2) the control group (n = 95) receiving standard treatment. This study prospectively collected comprehensive clinical data, including: (1) baseline demographic characteristics; (2) serial measurements of laboratory parameters (e.g., white blood cell count (WBC), lymphocyte percentage (LY%), C-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin (PCT), and interleukin-6 (IL-6)) at pre- and post-treatment intervals; and (3) Pneumonia Severity Index (PSI) scores at admission. Patient survival outcomes were systematically recorded, including: (1) time-to-event endpoints (overall survival duration from enrollment to death or last follow-up), and (2) clinical outcomes. Results No statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups regarding WBC, CRP, PCT, or IL-6 levels at baseline (all p ≥ 0.05). However, the LY% in the artificial liver treatment group was significantly lower compared to the conventional therapy group (p < 0.05). Post-treatment analysis revealed that the ALPA group…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 151 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free