Evidence Hub

Meta-analysis of vancomycin versus linezolid in pneumonia with proven methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

Hideo Kato, Mao Hagihara, N. Asai, Y. Shibata, Yusuke Koizumi, Y. Yamagishi, H. Mikamo

Journal of Global Antimicrobial Resistance, 2021

6,125 participants · 69 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND

American Thoracic Society/Infectious Diseases Society of America (ATS/IDSA) guidelines suggest that linezolid (LZD) is preferred over vancomycin (VCM) for treating methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) pneumonia. We conducted a systematic review and comparative meta-analysis of VCM and LZD efficacy against proven MRSA pneumonia.

METHODS

We searched EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and PubMed until November 2019. The outcomes of the meta-analysis were mortality, clinical cure, microbiological evaluation, and adverse events.

RESULTS

Seven randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with a total of 1,239 patients and eight retrospective cohort or case-control studies (CSs) with a total 6,125 patients were identified. Clinical cure and microbiological eradication rates were significantly increased in patients treated with LZD in RCTs (clinical cure: risk rate (RR) = 0.81, 95% confidential interval (CI) = 0.71-0.92, microbiological eradication: RR = 0.71, 95% CI = 0.62-0.81) and CSs (clinical cure: odds rate (OR) = 0.35, 95% CI = 0.18-0.69). However, mortality was comparable between patients treated with VCM and LZD in RCTs (RR = 1.08, 95% CI = 0.88-1.32) and CSs (OR = 1.20, 95% CI = 0.94-1.53). Likewise, there was no significant difference in adverse events between VCM and LZD in CSs (thrombocytopenia: OR = 0.95, 95% CI = 0.50-1.82, nephrotoxicity: OR = 1.72, 95% CI = 0.85-3.45).

CONCLUSIONS

According to our meta-analysis…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 6,125 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free