Evidence Hub

In Silico ADME Methods Used in the Evaluation of Natural Products

Robert Ancuceanu, Beatrice Elena Lascu, Doina Drăgănescu, Mihaela Dinu

Pharmaceutics, 2025

51 citations

Abstract

The pharmaceutical industry faces significant challenges when promising drug candi-dates fail during development due to suboptimal ADME (absorption, distribution, metab-olism, excretion) properties or toxicity concerns. Natural compounds are subject to the same pharmacokinetic considerations. In silico approaches offer a compelling advantage: they eliminate the need for physical samples and laboratory facilities, while providing rapid and cost-effective alternatives to expensive and time-consuming experimental test-ing. Computational methods can often effectively address common challenges associated with natural compounds, such as chemical instability and poor solubility. Through a re-view of the relevant scientific literature, we present a comprehensive analysis of in silico methods and tools used for ADME prediction, specifically examining their application to natural compounds. Whereas we focus on identifying the predominant computational approaches applicable to natural compounds, these tools were developed for conventional drug discovery and are of general use. We examine an array of computational approaches for evaluating natural compounds, including fundamental methods like quantum me-chanics calculations, molecular docking, and pharmacophore modeling, as well as more complex techniques such as QSAR analysis, molecular dynamics simulations, and PBPK modeling.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a preprint, done in computer models (in silico), not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free