Evidence Hub

Successful Management of Severe COVID-19 in a Kidney Transplant Recipient Safe Co-Administered Tacrolimus and Ensitrelvir: A Case Report

Miyagawa N, Yamanouchi S, Fujimoto H, Uchikanezaki E, Kameyama Y, Ashino Y, Hattori T

Reports (MDPI), 2026

19 participants

Abstract

Background and Clinical Significance: COVID-19 may worsen in patients receiving immunosuppressants. Furthermore, drug-drug interactions and concomitant use of anti-inflammatory drugs complicate treatment. We report the clinical course of severe COVID-19 pneumonia in a 74-year-old Japanese male kidney transplant recipient. Case Presentation: The patient had been taking tacrolimus (TAC) (2.5 mg/day), mycophenolate mofetil (1000 mg/day), and prednisone (5 mg/day) since his kidney transplant 7 years earlier. Twenty days before admission, he tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 antigen and was administered molnupiravir for 5 days. At admission, real-time PCR testing of a nasopharyngeal specimen revealed high viral loads, with Ct values of 22.2 and 27.9 for the E and N2 genes, respectively. An oxygen flow rate of 15 L/min was required to maintain arterial oxygen saturation above 90%. TAC was continued, and antibiotics, steroids, anti-interleukin-6 receptor antibodies, intravenous immunoglobulin, and ensitrelvir (ESV) were administered. With invasive positive-pressure ventilation, positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), and prone positioning, the arterial oxygen tension/inspired oxygen tension (P/F) improved from 61.3 to 386 within 7 h. The patient was extubated 30 h after admission. The TAC dose was adjusted from 2.5 mg/day to 1 mg/day to achieve the target trough level. The patient was discharged on hospital day 8. PCR testing at discharge showed a decrease in viral load. Conclusions:…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health. Reported size: 19 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free