Evidence Hub

Case Report: Acute interstitial pneumonia as the initial presentation of Anti-EJ antisynthetase syndrome: a case of severe respiratory failure with rapid response to cyclophosphamide

Królak-Nowak K, Czchowski K, Łoskot-Pawlik W, Opinc-Rosiak A, Makowska J, Antczak A

Frontiers in immunology, 2026

Abstract

Background: Antisynthetase syndrome (ASyS) associated with anti-EJ antibodies (directed against glycyl-tRNA synthetase) is increasingly recognized as an ILD-dominant phenotype with a propensity for rapidly progressive ILD (RP-ILD). Acute interstitial pneumonia (AIP)-like presentations may mimic severe infection, posing significant diagnostic challenges.

Case presentation: A 55-year-old man with hypertension and a 20-pack-year smoking history presented with a fever (39°C) and rapidly progressive dyspnea. Laboratory findings revealed markedly elevated inflammatory markers. CT pulmonary angiogram demonstrated diffuse bilateral ground-glass opacities, consolidations, and interlobular septal thickening consistent with AIP-pattern. Despite broad-spectrum antibiotics, the patient developed refractory respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation, hemodynamic instability requiring vasopressors, and acute kidney injury. Bronchoscopy with transbronchial biopsy confirmed acute interstitial inflammation. After more than one week in the intensive care unit (ICU) without improvement, rheumatologic evaluation revealed positive for anti-EJ and anti-Th/To antibodies, supporting ASyS. High-dose of immunosuppressive drug were initiated, resulting in marked improvement in oxygenation, hemodynamics, and muscle strength within 48 hours. Follow-up CT at three weeks demonstrated significant regression of ground-glass opacities with residual findings consistent with nonspecific interstitial…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free