Evidence Hub

Severe Legionnaires' disease refractory to azithromycin: Are quinolones superior to macrolides?

Croal-Abrahams L, Arinze F

IDCases, 2025

Abstract

Legionnaires' disease is typically treated with either a macrolide or fluoroquinolone. Antimicrobial sensitivity testing of clinical samples is not routinely done because Legionella is difficult to culture. Controlled trials to suggest non-inferiority of either class are limited. We present a case of a 43-year-old immunosuppressed man with severe Legionella pneumonia whose clinical course was complicated by persistent fevers, acute metabolic encephalopathy, septic shock, rhabdomyolysis, and acute kidney injury while on azithromycin. He rapidly improved after a switch to levofloxacin. The current guidelines recommend either using a quinolone or macrolide for Legionella pneumonia. However, there are conflicting data suggestive of a benefit of quinolones over macrolides. Our case prompts the question of optimal antibiotic choice in cases of severe Legionnaires' disease in immunocompromised patients and highlights the need for randomized controlled trials for further guidance.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free