Evidence Hub

Cross-sectional study of calves from Norwegian fattening herds with enzootic pneumonia: pathogen occurrence, clinical relevance, antimicrobial resistance, and agreement between respiratory tract sampling sites

L. M. Anestad, S. E. Falkeid, V. S. Oma, R. T. Garmo, Amelia R. Woolums, A. M. Bjelland, M. Stokstad, T. B. Klem

Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 2026

2 citations

Abstract

Bovine respiratory disease (BRD) is a leading cause of morbidity and antimicrobial use in calves. Laboratory diagnostics are limited by difficulty obtaining lower airway samples from live animals and the common presence of many BRD-associated bacteria in healthy calves, complicating culture interpretation. This study aimed to investigate the occurrence, clinical relevance, and antimicrobial resistance patterns of BRD-associated bacteria in calves from Norwegian fattening herds with enzootic pneumonia, and to evaluate agreement between upper and lower airway sampling sites. In a cross-sectional study, 88 calves from seven fattening herds were clinically scored and classified as healthy or diseased. Nasal swabs, nasopharyngeal swabs, bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid, and serum samples were collected for bacterial culture, antimicrobial susceptibility testing by disc diffusion, and serology. Pasteurella multocida and Mannheimia haemolytica were the most frequently detected bacteria across sampling sites, while Histophilus somni was less common. In BAL samples, P. multocida was the predominant bacterium identified and was significantly associated with clinical disease. Agreement between upper airway samples and BAL for Pasteurellaceae detection was slight to fair at the individual level. However, group-level isolation rates for P. multocida were similar across sampling sites in diseased calves. Most isolates were susceptible to common BRD antimicrobials, although…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free