Evidence Hub

The Role of Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Count Ratio in the Differential Diagnosis of Pulmonary Tuberculosis and Bacterial Community-Acquired Pneumonia: a Cross-Sectional Study at Ayder and Mekelle Hospitals, Ethiopia

M. Berhane, M. Melku, Anteneh Amsalu, Bamlaku Enawgaw, Zegeye Getaneh, Fikir Asrie

Clinical Laboratory, 2019

146 participants · 63 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The differential diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis and bacterial community-acquired pneumonia is often a challenging phenomenon. The neutrophil to lymphocyte count ratio, a suitable indicator of inflammation, has been demonstrated to be a useful biomarker for predicting bacteremia. The main aim this study is to evaluate the role of neutrophil to lymphocyte count ratio in the differential diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis and bacterial Community-Acquired Pneumonia at Ayder and Mekelle hospitals, Mekelle, Ethiopia.

METHODS

A hospital based cross-sectional study was conducted from February to May 2017 on a total of 146 patients at Ayder and Mekelle hospitals. After taking written informed consent, study participants were interviewed for a detailed history and 5 mL of blood was collected for hematological analysis. Pulmonary tuberculosis was diagnosed by using Ziehl-Neelsen and Gene X-pert. Community acquired pneumonia was diagnosed using sputum culture. Student's t-test, Pearson's chi-square test, and receiver operating characteristics curve analysis were used. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

The neutrophil to lymphocyte count ratio and eythrocyte sedimentation rate were significantly higher in pulmonary tuberculosis patients than bacterial community-acquired pneumonia patients. Neutrophil to lymphocyte count ratio and eythrocyte sedimentation rate with cutoff values of ≥ 2.72 and ≥ 39, respectively, showed the highest area…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 146 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free