Evidence Hub

Incidence rate and risk factors of ventilator-associated pneumonia in patients with traumatic brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies

Sina Chen, Guanchen Gao, Ying Xia, Zhongqi-Phyllis Wu

Journal of Thoracic Disease, 2023

2,301 participants · 23 citations

Abstract

Background Ventilator-associated pneumonia is a common complication of traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients, causing great harm to the life, health and society of patients. It is important to understand the risk factors related to ventilator-associated pneumonia for infection monitoring and control of patients. However, there are still some controversies about the risk factors in previous studies. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to explore the incidence and risk factors of ventilator-associated pneumonia in patients with TBI. Methods Two independent researchers selected literature collected by systematically searching databases including PubMed, Ovid, Embase, and ScienceDirect using medical subject headings. The primary end points of the included literature were extracted, and the Cochrane Q test and I2 statistic were used to evaluate the heterogeneity between studies. The random effects model based on the restricted maximum likelihood method and the fixed effects model based on the reverse variance method were used to calculate and combine the relative risk or mean difference of relevant indicators. The publication bias was evaluated with the funnel plot and Egger test. All results were considered statistically significant at P<0.05. Results A total of 11 articles were included in this study for meta-analysis, and a total of 2,301 patients with TBI were included. The incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia in TBI patients was approximately 42% (95% CI:…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 2,301 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free