Evidence Hub

Association of preoperative controlling nutritional status score with clinical outcomes among surgical patients with esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis

Yan-Li Ji, Lei Wang, Xiaoli Mei, E. Zheng, Lin Lin, Mei Yang

Frontiers in Oncology, 2025

1 citation

Abstract

Purpose The aim of this study was to identify the relationship between preoperative controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score and long-term and short-term outcomes in patients with esophageal cancer receiving esophagectomy. Methods The Web of Science, EMBASE, PubMed, and CNKI databases were searched up to 24 January 2025. Primary outcome was long-term survival such as the overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and cancer-specific survival (CSS). Secondary outcomes included the postoperative overall complication, incision infection, anastomotic fistula, pneumonia, respiratory complication, 90-day death, cardiovascular complication, major adverse cerebrocardiovascular event (MACCE), pulmonary atelectasis, and pulmonary embolism. Hazard ratio (HR) and odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were separately combined for the primary and secondary outcomes. Subgroup analysis for the OS and DFS by neoadjuvant therapy and pathological type was further conducted. Results Eighteen studies with 5,495 cases were included. Pooled results manifested that elevated preoperative CONUT score predicted significantly worse OS (HR = 1.75, 95% CI: 1.30–2.37, p<0.001), DFS (HR=1.21, 95% CI: 1.13–1.30, p < 0.001), and CSS (HR = 2.60, 95% CI: 1.65–4.10, p<0.001). Subgroup analysis for the OS and DFS by the history of neoadjuvant therapy and pathological type demonstrated similar results. Furthermore, elevated CONUT score was significantly related to increased risk of…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free