Evidence Hub

Effect of Exercise Training on Prognosis in Community-acquired Pneumonia: A Randomized Controlled Trial

C. Ryrsø, D. Faurholt-Jepsen, Christian Ritz, M. H. Hegelund, A. Dungu, B. K. Pedersen, R. Krogh-Madsen, B. Lindegaard

Clinical Infectious Diseases, 2023

186 participants · 8 citations

Abstract

Abstract Objective To investigate the effect of standard care (SoC) combined with supervised in-bed cycling (Bed-Cycle) or booklet exercises (Book-Exe) versus SoC in community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). Methods In this randomized controlled trial, 186 patients with CAP were assigned to SoC (n = 62), Bed-Cycle (n = 61), or Book-Exe (n = 63). Primary outcome length of stay (LOS) was analyzed with analysis of covariance. Secondary outcomes, 90-day readmission, and 180-day mortality were analyzed with Cox proportional hazard regression and readmission days with negative-binominal regression. Results LOS was −2% (95% CI: −24 to 25) and −1% (95% CI: −22 to 27) for Bed-Cycle and Book-Exe, compared with SoC. Ninety-day readmission was 35.6% for SoC, 27.6% for Bed-Cycle, and 21.3% for Book-Exe. Adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) for 90-day readmission was 0.63 (95% CI: .33–1.21) and 0.54 (95% CI: .27–1.08) for Bed-Cycle and Book-Exe compared with SoC. aHR for 90-day readmission for combined exercise was 0.59 (95% CI: .33–1.03) compared with SoC. aHR for 180-day mortality was 0.84 (95% CI: .27–2.60) and 0.82 (95% CI: .26–2.55) for Bed-Cycle and Book-Exe compared with SoC. Number of readmission days was 226 for SoC, 161 for Bed-Cycle, and 179 for Book-Exe. Incidence rate ratio for readmission days was 0.73 (95% CI: .48–1.10) and 0.77 (95% CI: .51–1.15) for Bed-Cycle and Book-Exe compared with SoC. Conclusions Although supervised exercise training during admission with CAP did not reduce LOS or…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 186 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free