Evidence Hub

Association Between Blood Urea Nitrogen Levels and Length of Stay in Patients with Pneumonic Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Exacerbation: A Secondary Analysis Based on a Multicentre, Retrospective Cohort Study

Jie Du, Jing Niu, Lan-Xiang Ma, Yong-Jie Sui, Shui-Li Wang

International Journal of COPD, 2022

1,226 participants · 14 citations

Abstract

Purpose High blood urea nitrogen (BUN) is associated with an elevated risk of mortality in various diseases, such as heart failure and pneumonia. Heart failure and pneumonia are common comorbidities of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbation. However, data on the relationship of BUN levels with length of stay (LOS) in patients with pneumonic COPD exacerbation are sparse. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the correlation between BUN levels and LOS in a cohort of patients with pneumonic COPD exacerbation. Patients and Methods The present study was a multicentre, retrospective cohort study. A total of 1226 patients with pneumonic COPD exacerbation were included through a validated algorithm derived from the 10th revision of the International Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD-10). It should be noted that the entire study was completed by Shiroshita et al, who uploaded the data to the DATADRYAD website. The author only used these data for secondary analysis. Results After adjusting for potential confounders (age, gender), a nonlinear relationship was detected between BUN levels less than 40 mg/dl and LOS. The effect sizes and the confidence intervals on the left and right sides of the inflection point were 0.27 (0.16, 0.39) and −0.17 (−0.34, 0.01), respectively. Conclusion High levels of BUN in the hospital may be associated with increased LOS. BUN was positively related to LOS when BUN was less than 40 mg/dl.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a secondary / pooled analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 1,226 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free